AI will do more harm than good to employment.” Do you agree or disagree?
학생이 쓴 원문
There is widespread fear that AI would do more harm than good to employment. Many companies are reducing hiring levels either to save costs and reinvest in artificial intelligence infrastructure, as Meta and Microsoft are doing, or to have AI tools take over tasks previously performed by certain employee groups, such as new graduates for manual tasks and software engineers for coding. I agree that AI would do more harm than good to employment because it replaces the tasks done by various workforces. However, the transformation would be more gradual than initially anticipated. This is because the accuracy level of artificial intelligence is not high enough, and humans choose to talk to human representatives. For more than 5 years, I have heard many companies touting that customer service agents will be replaced by AI bots. However, none of it succeeded in being replaced 100% because technical glitz is prevalent in AI tools and lacks a human touch making customer uncomfortable.
강사 첨삭
Thank you for this as well, Aciel. Regardless of AI\'s pros and cons, we can all agree that it will be a big part of our future. It\'s inevitable.
There is widespread fear that AI would do more harm than good to employment.
>>> correct
Many companies are reducing hiring levels either to save costs and reinvest in artificial intelligence infrastructure, as Meta and Microsoft are doing, or to have AI tools take over tasks previously performed by certain employee groups, such as new graduates for manual tasks and software engineers for coding. >>> correct
I agree that AI would do more harm than good to employment because it replaces the tasks done by various workforces.
>>> correct
However, the transformation would be more gradual than initially anticipated.
>>> correct
This is because the accuracy level of artificial intelligence is not high enough, and humans choose to talk to human representatives.
>>> OR: This is because the accuracy level of artificial intelligence is not high enough, and humans still prefer to talk to human representatives.
For more than 5 years, I have heard many companies touting that customer service agents will be replaced by AI bots.
>>> OR: For more than five years, I have heard many companies claim that customer service agents will be replaced by AI bots.
However, none of it succeeded in being replaced 100% because technical glitz is prevalent in AI tools and lacks a human touch making customer uncomfortable.
>>> correct
>>> OR: However, none of it has succeeded in being fully replaced because technical glitches are still prevalent in AI tools, and they lack a human touch, making customers uncomfortable.
파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.