Do you think AI will replace doctors in the future? Why or why not?

2026-07-22 · 첨삭 강사 Polly

학생이 쓴 원문

Whether AI can replace human doctors largely depends on how effectively medical interest groups lobby lawmakers because legal practice ultimately will be amended by them. Beyond political lobbying, civic action, public opinion also influence these legislative changes. To the best of my knowledge, AI healthcare technology is already advanced enough for commercial use, the real bottleneck is how we accept and adopt it. As we know, medical associations which have long benefited from a lucrative monopoly will resist this transition most fiercely to avoid being sidelined without doubt. In some sense, this is a turf war among stakeholder groups. Rather than protecting the collective interests of a single group, our focus should shift toward maximizing overall public benefit. Because the wave of AI adoption is unstoppable, we must establish how to integrate AI into medicine now, before other countries dominate the global AI healthcare market.

강사 첨삭

Hi, Steve!
This is a very impressive composition. I like how you looked at the issue from legal, social, and economic perspectives instead of focusing only on the technology itself. Your argument develops logically, and each point supports your overall opinion well.

Your ideas are thoughtful and persuasive, and your vocabulary allows you to discuss a complex topic with confidence. Excellent!
~Teacher Polly

Whether AI can replace human doctors largely depends on how effectively medical interest groups lobby lawmakers because legal practice ultimately will be amended by them.
>>Whether AI can replace human doctors largely depends on how effectively medical interest groups lobby lawmakers because medical regulations are ultimately amended by them.

Beyond political lobbying, civic action, public opinion also influence these legislative changes.
>>Beyond political lobbying, civic action and public opinion also influence these legislative changes.

To the best of my knowledge, AI healthcare technology is already advanced enough for commercial use, the real bottleneck is how we accept and adopt it. 
>>To the best of my knowledge, AI healthcare technology is already advanced enough for commercial use. The real bottleneck is how we accept and adopt it.

As we know, medical associations which have long benefited from a lucrative monopoly will resist this transition most fiercely to avoid being sidelined without doubt. 
>>As we know, medical associations, which have long benefited from a lucrative monopoly, will no doubt resist this transition most fiercely to avoid being sidelined.

In some sense, this is a turf war among stakeholder groups.
>>CORRECT

Rather than protecting the collective interests of a single group, our focus should shift toward maximizing overall public benefit.
>>CORRECT 

Because the wave of AI adoption is unstoppable, we must establish how to integrate AI into medicine now, before other countries dominate the global AI healthcare market.
>>CORRECT

파워잉글리쉬 영어첨삭교정 서비스에 실제로 접수된 글입니다. 작성자와 글에 등장하는 사람·회사 이름, 연락처 등 개인을 알아볼 수 있는 정보는 모두 지웠습니다. 문법 오류는 학습 자료로서의 가치를 위해 원문 그대로 두었습니다.

다른 영어첨삭교정 보기

영어첨삭교정 ·